The Effect Of Auditor Experience And Audit Fees On Fraud Detection With Professional Skepticism As A Moderating Variable

Authors

  • Nabilah Fathurohmah Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tri Bhakti Author
  • Wasfini Universitas Terbuka, Banten, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Auditor Experience, Audit Fees, Professional Skepticism, Fraud Detection

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine how Auditor Experience and Audit Fee affect Fraud Detection. As well as assessing how Professional Skepticism moderates Auditor Experience and Audit Fee on Fraud Detection.

Design/methodology/approachThis study uses quantitative research methods, using primary data collected from a population of 130 from several financial services sector companies registered in the Bekasi City area. Data analysis was performed using Partial Least Square (PLS) software with Moderated Regression Analysis.

Findings The results of this study found that Auditor Experience has a negative and insignificant effect on Fraud Detection, Audit Fee has a positive and significant effect on Fraud Detection, Skepticism strengthens the relationship between Auditor Experience and Fraud Detection, Professional Skepticism does not strengthen Audit Fee on Fraud Detection.

Research limitations/implicationsIn this assessment of fraud detection, where this research is a research that has been little discussed by previous researchers, which discusses the effect of audit fees on fraud detection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdillah, W., & Jogiyanto, H. (2015). Partial Least Square (Pls) = Alternatif Structural Equation Modeling (Sem) Dalam Penelitian Bisnis. 8(1), 2018–2020.

Adisaputri, A. F. (2024). Auditor’s Ability To Detect Fraud Through Experience, Competence, And Professional Skepticism With Commitment To Ethic As A Moderating Factors. 7, 1–23.

Alleyne, P., Persaud, N., Alleyne, P., Greenidge, D., & Sealy, P. (2010). Perceived Effectiveness Of Fraud Detection Audit Procedures In A Stock And Warehousing Cycle. The Eletronic Library, 34(1), 1–5.

Anggriawan, E. F. (2014). Pengaruh Pengalaman Kerja, Skeptisme Profesional Dan Tekanan Waktu Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Fraud (Studi Empiris Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Diy). Nominal, Barometer Riset Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 3(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.21831/Nominal.V3i2.2697

Arief, R., Martin, M., & Pakpahan, A. (2024). Pengaruh Independensi , Skeptisme , Pengalaman Kerja , Dan Fee Audit Terhadap Pendeteksian Kecurangan : Studi Empiris Di Wilayah Jakarta Pusat Pendahuluan. 2(1), 15–24.

Artika, A., & Faisal, Y. (2024). The Influence Of Muamalah Fiqh, Compensation And Religiosity On Fraudulent Behaviour. Jihbiz : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan Dan Perbankan Syariah, 8(2), 127–141. Https://Doi.Org/10.33379/Jihbiz.V8i2.4921

Astuti, T. D., Pabulo, A. M. A., Tombo, J. B., Rizqullah, D., Leu, Y. D. Salle B., Amiruddin, A. D. M. P., & Utami, D. T. (2024). Pengauditan.

Faisal, Y., Etty Murwaningsari, & Tatik Mariyanti. (2023). Maqashid Shariah Muzakki’s Review Using The Latest Seven Dimensions. International Journal Of Economic, Business, Accounting, Agriculture Management And Sharia Administration (Ijebas), 3(4), 1285–1297. Https://Doi.Org/10.54443/Ijebas.V3i4.1044

Ghozali, I. (2016). Desain Penelitian Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif Untuk Akuntansi, Bisnis Dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). Pls-Sem: Indeed A Silver Bullet. Journal Of Marketing Theory And Practice, 19(2), 139–152. Https://Doi.Org/10.2753/Mtp1069-6679190202

Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology Of Interpersonal Relations. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Kiswanto, K.-, & Maulana, P. A. (2019). Moderasi Pengalaman Pada Pengaruh Fraud Risk Assessment, Skeptisme, Dan Workload Terhadap Kemampuan Mendeteksi Kecurangan. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 14(2), 183. Https://Doi.Org/10.24843/Jiab.2019.V14.I02.P04

Korompis, C. W. M., & Latjandu, L. D. (2017). Pengaruh Narsisme Klien, Audit Fee, Independensi, Skeptisme Profesional, Dan Interlock Auditor Eksternal Terhadap Audit Judgement Dalam Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan (Studi Kasus Pada Kap Di Manado). Going Concern : Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 12(2), 594–604. Https://Doi.Org/10.32400/Gc.12.2.17977.2017

Laitupa, M. F., & Hehanussa, H. (2020). Pengaruh Pengalaman Kerja, Skeptisme Profesional Dan Tekanan Waktu Terhadap Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi •, 6(1), 1–22.

Pickett, K. H. S. (2010). The Internal Auditing Handbook.

Pratiwi, W., Rizal, N., Indrianasari, N. T., Wiyono, M. W., & Ifa, K. (2019). Auditor Competence, Auditor Independence, Auditor Experience, Audit Fees And Time Budget Pressure Against Fraud Detection. Journal Of Advanced Research In Dynamical And Control Systems, 11(12), 26–33. Https://Doi.Org/10.5373/Jardcs/V11i12/20193208

Rafnes, M., & Primasari, N. H. (2020). Pengaruh Skeptisisme Profesional, Pengalaman Auditor, Kompentensi Auditor Dan Beban Kerja Terhadap Pendeteksian Kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 9(1), 16–31.

Sood, P., & Bhushan, P. (2020). A Structured Review And Theme Analysis Of Financial Frauds In The Banking Industry. Asian Journal Of Business Ethics, 9(2), 305–321. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S13520-020-00111-W

Sukrisno, A. (2012). Auditing.

Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Fraud-The Human Face Of Fraud: Understanding The Suspect Is Vital To Any Investigation. Ca Magazine-Chartered Accountant, 136(4), 1–18.

Wicaksono, A. P. N., & Amalia, F. A. (2023). Buku Ajar Pemeriksaan Akuntansi.

Yusrianti, H. (2015). 3338-7140-1-Sm[1].Pdf.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-16

How to Cite

The Effect Of Auditor Experience And Audit Fees On Fraud Detection With Professional Skepticism As A Moderating Variable. (2025). Accounting and Auditing Azzukhruf Journal, 1(2), 126-136. https://ojs.azzukhrufcendikia.or.id/index.php/aaaj/article/view/52