The Effect Of Auditor Experience And Professional Skepticism On Fraud Detection With Workload As A Moderating Variable

Authors

  • Nicholla Anggelita Adinda Elta Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Tri Bhakti, Bekasi, Indonesia Author
  • Margareta Yosefa Meilani Universitas Nusa Cendana, Kupang, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Auditor Experience, Professional Skepticism, Fraud Detection, Workload

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to determine the effect of auditor experience and professional skepticism on fraud detection with workload as a moderating variable.  

Design/methodology/approachThis research uses quantitative research. This research was conducted using a questionnaire distributed to project admins, staff and PIC projects at PT. Deksha Orla Tranggana, namely 39 questionnaires distributed via social media in the form of whatsapp.  Each questionnaire distributed has 35 questions to be answered by respondents. From the distribution of questionnaires carried out, 30 respondents were obtained. To get the results of this study, this researcher used PLS SEM Version 3.0

FindingsThe results of this study indicate that the auditor experience variable has a positive and insignificant effect on fraud detection, professional skepticism has a positive and significant effect on fraud detection, workload does not strengthen the effect of auditor experience on fraud detection, and workload strengthens the effect of professional skepticism on fraud detection.

Research limitations/implicationsThis research focuses on fraud detection, which is to see how the right way to deal with fraud when you already have work experience and relate it to the workload given but must maintain a skeptical attitude towards an examination.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agus Yulistonoet Al. (2021). MANAJEMEN SDM (Pp. 59–61).

Agustina, F., Nurkholis, N., & Rusydi, M. (2021). Auditors’ Professional Skepticism And Fraud Detection. International Journal Of Research In Business And Social Science (2147- 4478), 10(4), 275–287. Https://Doi.Org/10.20525/Ijrbs.V10i4.1214

Arnanda, C. R., Purba, V. D., & Putri, A. P. (2022). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Profesionalisme, Beban Kerja, Pengalama Auditor Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan. Owner, 6(1), 769–780. Https://Doi.Org/10.33395/Owner.V6i1.666

Astuti, Tutut Dewial, A. M. (2024). PENGAUDITAN (Teori Dan Studi Akuntansi) (Pp. 2–3).

Faisal, Y., Pertiwi, A. R., & Karininda, A. (2023). Aprilia Risqi Pertiwi Aprielarizqi@Gmail.Com Aurel Karininda Feby Ayu Astari. 02(01), 87–102.

Febriansyah, A., & Novitasari, A. (2021). Analisis Skeptisisme Profesional Dan Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Pendeteksian Kecurangan (Studi Empiris Di Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Wilayah Kota Bandung). Journal Of Economics, Management, Business And Accounting, 1(2), 219–241. Https://Doi.Org/10.34010/Jemba.V1i2.6293

Hair, F. J., Ringle, M. C. & Wiliam C. Balck, Babi, Barry J., & Anderson, Rolph E. (2011). Multivariate Data Analysis. In Journal Of Marketing Theory And Practice (Vol. 19, Issue 2, Pp. 139–151).

Hajering, Muslim, Ahmad, H., & Lannai, D. (2022). Effect Of Workload And Auditor Personality Type On Fraud Detection. Point Of View Research Accounting And Auditing, 3(2), 177–190. Https://Journal.Accountingpointofview.Id/Index.Php/Povra

Ma’rifah, N., & Setiawan, A. (2022). Pengaruh Audit Forensik, Profesionalisme Auditor, Dan Komitmen Organisasi Terhadap Pendeteksian Fraud. Veteran Economics, Management & Accounting Review, 1(1), 1–18. Https://Doi.Org/10.59664/Vemar.V1i1.4825

Mustarikah, A. (2018). Skeptisme Profesional Memediasi Hubungan Independensi Dengan Kemampuan Auditor Mendeteksi Kecurangan. Jurnal Analisa Akuntansi Dan Perpajakan, 2(1), 87–111. Https://Doi.Org/10.25139/Jaap.V2i1.465

Nurdahlia, Rahmawati, I. K. (2020). Pengaruh Pengalaman Kerja Auditor Dan Integritas Auditor Terhadap. 2–13. Http://Repository.Umpalopo.Ac.Id/Id/Eprint/253

Ode, A. La, Wahyuniati, H., Angela, F., & Oktri, S. (2020). Auditor’s Ability To Detect Fraud: Independence, Audit Experience, Professional Skepticism, And Work Load Anto. Rjoas, 11(November), 192–205.

Rafnes, M., & Primasari, N. H. (2020). Pengaruh Skeptisisme Profesional, Pengalaman Auditor, Kompentensi Auditor Dan Beban Kerja Terhadap Pendeteksian Kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 9(1), 16–31.

Https://Journal.Budiluhur.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Akeu/Article/View/1410

Rahmawati, & Usman, H. (2014). Pengaruh Beban Kerja Dan Pengalaman Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Investasi, 15(1), 68–76.

Shopia, M., Nugroho, G. W., & ... (2020). Pengaruh Skeptisime Profesional Terhadap Upaya Pendeteksian Kecurangan (Case Study Pada PT BPR Cianjur Jabar). Seminar Nasional …, September, 361–373. Https://Proceeding.Unpkediri.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Senmea/Article/View/274

The Institute Of Internal Auditors (IIA). (2024). Global Internal Audit Standards (GIAS) 2024. 1–121.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-16

How to Cite

The Effect Of Auditor Experience And Professional Skepticism On Fraud Detection With Workload As A Moderating Variable. (2025). Accounting and Auditing Azzukhruf Journal, 1(2), 83-95. https://ojs.azzukhrufcendikia.or.id/index.php/aaaj/article/view/48